ANNOUNCEMENT

NOBEL PRIZE 2026

This year's laureates, their fields, and the discoveries that earned them the prize.Live nowSee the winners
Moonbase
← Back to Awards
NIHEUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENTR01

Offspring Neurodevelopment and Growth after Early Antihypertensive Therapy OR Preeclampsia in Women with Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP Child).

Active
Institution
University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL
Principal investigator
Alan Thevenet N. Tita
Funding
$1.5M
Duration
2023–2028
Open portfolio

Moonbase score

Still being scored

Abstract

The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) randomized trial recently led to new national recommendations regarding antihypertensive treatment for chronic hypertension (CHTN) during pregnancy. CHAP tested treatment (vs. none) initiated before 23 weeks for mild CHTN (BP <160/105 mmHg) at 61 US sites (N=2408). Treatment improved maternal and perinatal outcomes including preeclampsia, preterm birth and low birth weight. CHAP is the largest CHTN treatment trial in pregnancy. However, critical knowledge gaps remain concerning long-term effects of a) routine prenatal antihypertensive therapy and b) superimposed preeclampsia in women with CHTN on exposed offspring. Preeclampsia complicates >30% of patients with CHTN, is associated with impaired fetal growth, and emerging data suggest preeclampsia may impair neurodevelopment (ND) and childhood growth/cardio-metabolic outcomes– including elevated BMI and blood pressure (BP). Small for gestational age is an independent risk factor for impaired childhood ND and altered growth. Therefore, it is crucial to define the long-term effects of prenatal antihypertensive therapy on offspring (as well as mothers in our funded CHAP Maternal Follow-up study R01HL120338). CHAP has randomized treatment and adjudicated preeclampsia data to enhance rigor to address: Aim 1: Define the long-term safety of routine prenatal pharmacologic treatment of mild CHTN on childhood ND and growth. Hypothesis 1a: Antihypertensive therapy for mild CHTN to a BP goal <140/90 mmHg compared with no treatment is not associated with worse ND including cognitive functioning determined by General Conceptual Ability (GCA, primary outcome). If we demonstrate non-inferiority, we will also test whether therapy improves ND - given salutary neonatal results in CHAP. Hypothesis 1b: Antihypertensive therapy (goal <140/90 mmHg) vs. no treatment for mild CHTN is not associated with worse childhood growth and other cardio-metabolic outcomes including BMI ≥85th percentile (primary outcome), obesity, underweight, and BP. Aim 2: Determine whether preeclampsia superimposed on mild CHTN is associated with childhood outcomes including ND, growth and other cardio-metabolic outcomes. Hypothesis 2a: Preeclampsia (vs. no preeclampsia) is independently associated with adverse ND in children including impaired cognitive functioning by GCA (primary outcome). Hypothesis 2b: Preeclampsia is independently associated with altered childhood growth (including a primary outcome of BMI ≥85th percentile), obesity, underweight, serial growth and BP. We will also explore mechanisms of childhood ND and abnormal growth by evaluating pre-specified perinatal and postnatal characteristics as risk and predictive factors for abnormal ND and growth. The landmark CHAP findings and the NHLBI-funded CHAP maternal follow-up study offer a truly unique opportunity and synergy for this proposed child follow-up study in order to glean the complete picture of long- term effects of prenatal antihypertensive therapy and preeclampsia on offspring.

Research team

  • Paula Catherine Chandler-LaneyPI
  • Cassandra R. NewsomPI
  • Jeff M SzychowskiPI
  • Alan Thevenet N. TitaPI

LOADING MOONBASE SCORE

R01EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENTReproductive, Perinatal and Pediatric Health Study Section[RPPH]childhoodpreeclampsiaoffspringmmhgprenatalfollow-up studymildantihypertensive

Questions for University of Alabama at Birmingham

Answered by the team behind this research.

Same researchers, same institution, same topic, scored first.