ANNOUNCEMENT

NOBEL PRIZE 2026

This year's laureates, their fields, and the discoveries that earned them the prize.Live nowSee the winners
Moonbase
← Back to Awards
NIHEUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENTR01

Long-term effectiveness of a middle school dating violence prevention evaluation with and without an SMS booster

Active
Institution
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON, TX
Principal investigator
Jeff R Temple
Funding
$636K
Duration
2016–2027
Open portfolio

Moonbase score

Still being scored

Abstract

ABSTRACT Annually, approximately 25% of US teens and young adults sustain physical, psychological, or sexual abuse by dating partners. Many victims of dating violence (DV) experience negative and long-lasting consequences, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, suicidality, risky sexual behavior, substance misuse, academic disengagement, and adulthood intimate partner violence. Perpetrators of adolescent DV are at increased risk for continuing intimate partner violence in adulthood. Moreover, partner violence is costly to Americans, with one estimate putting the population economic burden at $3.6 trillion over victims' lifetimes. Given the prevalence, costs, and adverse mental, physical, and social health outcomes, effective and enduring prevention strategies are critically needed. Thus, we conducted an RCT of the 7th grade version of Fourth R in 24 middle schools (12 intervention schools, 12 control schools; n=2865 students) and found that students who received the intervention were significantly less likely to perpetrate DV. We propose to extend our school- based cluster RCT by 1) collecting an additional four years of annual follow-ups, when participants will be, on average, 21 years old and 8 years post-intervention; 2) augmenting data with school, neighborhood, and environmental factors that may moderate program impact; and 3) delivering a text-based booster to half of the students originally randomized to the intervention condition (n=666) and comparing them to students from control schools (n=1533) and to those who received Fourth R without a booster (n=666). Specific aims: 1) Determine the long-term impact of Fourth R in reducing DV, as indexed by less perpetration and victimization of physical, sexual, and psychological DV through adolescence and into emerging adulthood, relative to participants from control schools; 2) Determine the long-term impact of Fourth R, relative to control, in a) enhancing emotional well-being and increasing acquisition and use of healthy relationship skills, as indexed by improved problem-solving, communication, and conflict resolution skills through adolescence and into emerging adulthood; and b) ameliorating the modifiable cognitive and behavioral correlates associated with the perpetration and victimization of DV, as indexed by fewer attitudes justifying DV, decreased substance misuse and risky sexual behavior, increased school connectedness, improved academic performance, and decreased psychological symptoms through adolescence and into emerging adulthood; 3) Test the hypothesis that participants receiving an 18-week, 54-message text-based booster five years after receiving the Fourth R intervention will be least likely to perpetrate and experience DV and other risky behaviors, followed by students who received Fourth R without the booster, followed by participants in the control group; and 4) Evaluate the cost-effectiveness and fiscal impact of the Fourth R intervention and text-based booster. Preventing DV throughout the formative years has the enormous potential to improve the health, relationships, and wellbeing of countless lives, while also reducing the economic burden of this public health crisis.

LOADING MOONBASE SCORE

R01Social Psychology, Personality and Interpersonal Processes Study Section[SPIP]EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENTfourthboosterriskyadulthoodsubstance misusepartner violenceviolencedating

Questions for UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON

Answered by the team behind this research.

Same researchers, same institution, same topic, scored first.