ANNOUNCEMENT

NOBEL PRIZE 2026

This year's laureates, their fields, and the discoveries that earned them the prize.Live nowSee the winners
Moonbase
← Back to Awards
NIHNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASESR01

A BRIEF, TRANSDIAGNOSTIC COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT FOR UROLOGIC CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN SYNDROME (UCPPS): PROCESS, PREDICTIONS, OUTCOMES

Completed
Institution
STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO, NY
Principal investigator
Jeffrey M Lackner
Funding
$608K
Duration
2021–2026
Open portfolio

Moonbase score

Still being scored

Abstract

Abstract/Project Summary Urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) encompasses several common, costly diagnoses including interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome and chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome that are poorly understood and inadequately treated. Their prolonged personal and economic costs are amplified by the frequent co-occurrence of a cluster of centralized pain conditions (particularly irritable bowel syndrome 3 [IBS]) but also fibromyalgia [FMS], chronic headache, chronic fatigue, etc.) called Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions (COPC). Clinically, the notion that these syndromes share a centralized pain phenotype with a fundamental disturbance in pain or sensory processing dovetails with our preliminary research showing that a novel transdiagnostic behavioral treatment emphasizing a single common mechanistic pathway (i.e. inflexible cognitive style) reduces severity of both targeted (IBS) and untargeted multisymptom COPCs that include (but is not limited to) to UCPPS, FMS, chronic fatigue, and chronic headache. If effective in a larger scale study, a transdiagnostic UCPPS treatment would offer a more efficient, accessible, and broadly useful strategy for improving chronic pelvic pain and its most frequent and complicating comorbidities. To this end, we will randomize 240 UCPPS subjects (18-70 yrs.) of any gender and race to a 4-session version of CBT that teaches skills for self-managing UCPPS symptoms (e.g. pelvic pain, urinary symptoms) with minimal clinician oversight (MC-CBT) or a four- session non-specific education/support control (EDU). Efficacy assessments will be administered at pre- treatment and two weeks after the end of the 10-week acute phase. We hypothesize MC-CBT will deliver significantly greater UCPPS symptom improvement than EDU (Aim 1). Additional aims include characterizing the durability of effects 3- and 6 months post treatment (Aim 2). To increase the efficacy and efficiency of behavioral pain treatments, we draw upon Beck’s transdiagnostic cognitive model13 to characterize the precise cognitive procedures and corresponding operative processes (e.g., cognitive distancing14, context sensitivity, coping flexibility, repetitive negative thought) that drive MC-CBT induced UCPPS symptom relief relative to EDU (Aim 3) as well as baseline patient variables that moderate differential response (Aim 3) with the ultimate goal of more proactive patient-treatment matching fundamental to the goals of personalized medicine. By applying innovative statistical modelling (e.g. dominance analysis, Randomized Explanatory Trial analyses) to study aims in the context of a rigorously designed behavioral trial, we expand the portfolio of nondrug pain treatments for UCPPS and co-aggregating COPCs to include one whose brevity, convenience, and transdiagnostic design “meets patients where they are”20 and addresses the practical (access, complexity, cost), clinical (breadth, durability, magnitude of effects, patient preference) and conceptual (untargeted comorbidities, non-pain somatic symptoms) challenges that have impeded uptake and public health impact of evidence-based behavioral pain treatments at a time when our most vulnerable high impact pain patients are in greatest need.

LOADING MOONBASE SCORE

R01NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASESBiobehavioral Medicine and Health Outcomes Study Section[BMHO]transdiagnosticpainpain conditionsheadacheurologicibspelvicpelvic pain

Questions for STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO

Answered by the team behind this research.

Same institution, same topic, scored first.