ANNOUNCEMENT

NOBEL PRIZE 2026

This year's laureates, their fields, and the discoveries that earned them the prize.Live nowSee the winners
Moonbase
← Back to Awards
NIHNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCESR35

Computational methods for characterizing sources of variability in drug response

Active
Institution
Stanford University, CA
Principal investigator
Russ Biagio Altman
Funding
$348K
Duration
2024–2029
Open portfolio

Moonbase score

Still being scored

Abstract

Enter the text here that is the new abstract information for your application. This section must be no longer than 30 lines of text. Drugs are approved by regulators because they are relatively safe and effective. However, there are typically unanswered basic science questions about the detailed mechanisms of action, the impacts of genetic and epigenetic variation, and the full range of phenotypic responses. This missing knowledge often leads to reduced efficacy and increased adverse events. My overall scientific goal is to generate more complete understanding of the mechanisms of drug response and their sources of variation, in order to enable more precise drug therapies. The last two decades has seen an explosion of data relevant to drug response. We have abundant data about human genetic variation and gene expression (and other omic) profiles that illuminate key cellular pathways in disease. Advances in protein 3D structure prediction provide useful models for most proteins, which enable proteome-wide screening for off-target drug interactions. Biobanks, electronic medical records (EMR), FDA adverse event databases and medical claims data provide clinical information and environmental exposures. My lab has a track record creating methods for analysis of all these critical data types. We focus on computational/statistical approaches that integrate data at all scales. In 2000, we created the Pharmacogenetics Knowledgebase (PharmGKB) which curates information about how human genetic variation influences variation in drug response. PharmGKB has high quality information for 100s of drugs and genes, but pharmacogenetics typically explains far less than ~50% of variation in drug response. I hypothesize that a large fraction of the remaining variation can be explained by unknown off-targets, undiscovered pathways of drug response, genetic and epigenetic differences in expression, and differences in disease physiology. Thus, my proposed work focuses on computational methods that use publicly available data to answer five driving questions: (1) What are the full set of clinical responses to drugs, alone and in combination? (2) What are the molecular targets (particularly off-targets) that are modulated by a drug? (3) What are the pathways that modulate drug response? (4) How does genetic variation in targets/pathways lead to variation in drug response? (5) How do epigenetics create variability in drug response? We will evaluate our methods with independent, held-out gold standard data sets (to establish quantitative statistical performance), and collaborate with experimental colleagues to validate key novel hypotheses. We will focus on genes and pathways that are critical in drug response.

LOADING MOONBASE SCORE

R35NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCESSpecial Emphasis Panel[ZRG1-BBBT-H(56)R]variationgenetic variationcomputational methodsdruggenetic epigeneticdrug responsehuman genetictext

Questions for Stanford University

Answered by the team behind this research.

Same institution, same topic, scored first.