ANNOUNCEMENT

NOBEL PRIZE 2026

This year's laureates, their fields, and the discoveries that earned them the prize.Live nowSee the winners
Moonbase
← Back to Awards
NIHNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCESR01

Removing batch effects in high-throughput biomedical studies

Active
Institution
RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES, NJ
Principal investigator
William Evan Johnson
Funding
$283K
Duration
2018–2027
Open portfolio

Moonbase score

Still being scored

Abstract

Project Summary/Abstract Combining high-throughput biomedical data sets from multiple studies is advantageous to increase statistical power in studies where logistical considerations restrict sample size or require the sequential generation of data. However, significant technical heterogeneity is commonly observed across multiple batches of data that are generated from different processing or reagent batches, experimenters, protocols, or profiling platforms. These so-called batch effects confound true relationships in the data, reducing the power benefits of combining multiple batches of data, and may even lead to spurious results. Many methods have been proposed to filter technical heterogeneity from genomic data. These methods are designed to remove batch effects, unmeasured or “surrogate” variation, or other “unwanted” variation caused by biological or technical sources. Although these approaches represent impactful advances in the field, there are still significant gaps that need to be addressed to appropriately filter technical heterogeneity from -omics data and other high-throughput datasets. For example, many existing methods assume relevant covariates are known or that raw data are generally independent. Some applications require more specific and direct correction methods, including single cell transcriptomics data that are often missing cell-type identifiers, microbiome data that are compositional in nature, and imaging and spatial transcriptomics data that have spatially correlated data points. Furthermore, batch correction introduces correlation into the adjusted data, which needs to be accounted for in downstream analyses, and most researchers performing batch correction are unaware of this negative impact and often incorrectly apply downstream analysis tools. Finally, there is still significant need for additional software tools and benchmark datasets for evaluating batch effect methods and their efficacy in specific datasets. We propose to develop algorithms and software to address these specific research gaps facing researchers combining data from multiple experimental batches.

LOADING MOONBASE SCORE

R01NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCESGenomics, Computational Biology and Technology Study Section[GCAT]filtertranscriptomicsdatasetsheterogeneitycombininghigh-throughputbatchcorrection

Questions for RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES

Answered by the team behind this research.

Same researchers, same institution, same topic, scored first.